Responding to Gee and Delpit

Quickwrite #1:
The terms used by Gee are directly related to the overall argument concerning Dominant Discourses and Non-Dominant Discourses. He uses terms such as “apprenticeship” to illustrate the relationship Gee believes is required for one to acquire a new discourse. “Acquisition” is a term used by Gee to illustrate the process by which these different discourses are obtained; that is, in a subconscious, immersed fashion. These different terms work in collaboration with the other terms, primarily the ones related to Discourse and literacies, in order to frame Gee’s overall argument. His argument and the Survival Words used are relevant to teaching and learning considering the nature of their use. For instance, Discourse is discussed in order to establish a relationship between Dominant Discourses and “social goods,” as well as Non-Dominant Discourses and a lack there of. He discusses the inequality between Dominant Discourses and Non-Dominant Discourses with a focus on the education setting. Additionally, Gee addresses the issue of Discourse and the social situations and educational environments that may be created in order to fix the problem; however, Gee states that a social change must take place before any educational change can be effective.

Quickwrite #2:
The Survival Words used by Delpit relate to the article because of the message the terms alone convey. For instance, the terms “cheating,” “not-teaching,” and “not-learning” illustrate some of the issues Delpit wishes to address and some of the concerns or objections she has with Gee’s article. The terms are very relevant to literacy and teaching considering they deal with Delpit’s argument in favor of teaching students Dominant Discourses and her belief that his can be done. Additionally, the terms depict some of Delpit’s objections and disagreements concerning Gee’s article. For instance, Delpit argues that if teachers were to heed Gee’s advice, they would choose to “not-teach” because they would believe it somehow empowers the students. However, Delpit argues that “not-teaching” and “not-learning” do quite the opposite. She believes that students need to acquire a Dominant Discourse in order to express their beliefs and opinions to a wider audience, and therefore empower themselves by obtaining a discourse that allows them to make direct objections to the community that makes use of the Dominant Discourse.